Agenda 21: How Globalist Domination Happens on a Local Level
Agenda 21 wants to, among other things, bring the American lands back to rewilding.
The non-governmental organization (NGO) The Wildlands Project (WP) is a focusing of the American landscape in preservation for “future generations to inherit a continent rich in wildlife, with plenty of room for all species to roam.”
This does not necessarily mean that there will be room for humans as we are seeing massive areas of land being placed under restrictions called “conservation easements”, “scenic byways”, “protected areas”, “biosphere reserves”, “wildlife refuges”, etc. The names are varied and plentiful, but the result is always the same: More government control; less human freedom.
The WP claims we are “experiencing the Sixth Great Extinction” because of “human population growth, climate change, resource extraction, new recreational technologies, habitat fragmentation”. Since humanity is not a “highly interactive species” (meaning species whose presence maintains the balance of other plant and animal species with the habitat they share) “we are running out of room to share with nature”.
The science-based agenda of WP has developed the solution of dividing up North America into “four Continental Wildways [of] large protected corridors of land running coast to coast . . . throughout Canada, the US and Mexico.” Agenda 21 explains why the North American Union is being pushed by the globalists.- The Eastern Wildway extending northward from the Everglades along the Appalachians to the Arctic
- The Western Wildway spanning the continent from Mexico, through the Rockies, to Alaska
- The Pacific Wildway running from Baja to Alaska
- The Boreal Wildway running west-east from Alaska to the Canadian Maritimes across the forest roof of North America
The wildways are “constructed by protecting core areas connected to one another by corridors or linkages. They are essentially mosaics of connected public and private lands that provide habitat and safe passageways for wildlife to travel freely from place to place.”
In the January 2012 Review of Implementation of Agenda 21 and the Rio Principles details the progress the UN has had on their Agenda 21 policies on the local and national levels.
Under the World Trade Organization (WTO) the UN has seen major advances in the developing countries (i.e. Africa, India, Southeast Asia) where they have “embraced the reforms of the WTO regime” where “global import tariffs” have been used as protective measures since 1995.
National subsidies have turned “agricultural commodities” over to the global Elite International cooperation and recognition of the UN’s superiority in the implementation of their schemes. Through the World Bank (WB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the manipulation of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI) uses reinvested funds that are dumped into UN approved public service programs, healthcare and education.
According to research from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) the issues caused by man-made climate change and its impact on the environment cannot be resolved by a single country or member of academia, but through the IIASA and the UN the securitization of energy on a national level can be reworked to reflect Agenda 21 Sustainable Development.
IIASA research has turned up a strategic plan that:
- Controls the allocation of energy to individuals and businesses
- Control transportation and production of global food
- Control water resources used for agriculture and personal
- Allocate resources under UN guidelines of mitigation of CO2 emissions
Research focuses on the “transformational nature of the modern world.” IIASA is one of the foundations of the global transformation of local communities to reflect Agenda 21.
One way Agenda 21 is manifesting right now is in Transition Towns . Under the Transition Model , global relocalization agendas are forefront.
The dangers that Transition Towns impose on our sovereignty and individuality are:- Refocus town planning and infrastructure on implementation of Agenda 21
- Appear to be grassroots operations
- Promote the Peak Oil mythology as an energy scare-tactic
- Support SmarthGrowth which is code for Agenda 21
- Aspire to control framing, disburse ability to farm, and pressure governmental policies on farming that reflect Agenda 21
- Use the hoax of man-made climate change as the purpose for imposing policy control by building cities that are designed to reduce carbon emissions
- Securitize local food stores, businesses, healthcare and fuel
- Ensure SmarthGrowth controls all citizens ability to acquire any needs for human survival
- Create internal advocacies that band together to purvey Transition Town propaganda to elected officials and local governments
The European Union has adopted regulations that ban the construction of single-family homes beginning in 2020. These new dwellings, called passive houses will be “zero-energy buildings”. To control urban communities in so far as “tangible spatial” development and the literal process of construction, Germany is creating policies that facilitate “compact” housing that is more “energy efficient”.
During the recent UN Earth Summit on Sustainable Development in Rio+20, governments and private sector corporations have pledged to fund the UN’s endeavors toward global governance with a generous $513 billion for Agenda 21 projects that will restrict the movements of humans, perverse biodiversity and assist the UN in attaining their Millennium Development Goals.
Hillary Clinton, US Secretary of State supports the incorporation of the Agenda 21 movement. She remarked that “sustainability won’t happen without business investment. Governments alone cannot solve all the problems we face, from climate change to persistent poverty to chronic energy shortages. That’s why we are so strongly in favor of partnerships.”
As far as UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon is concerned, the money from corporations and governments cannot come at a better time. Ki-moon claims that “words must translate into action” with regard to moving the environmental governance agenda forward.
Ki-moon says that since the first UNCSD, the incremental slide toward total global governance has spawned UN conventions on climate change, biodiversity and desertification, as well as the Agenda 21 blueprint for sustainable development, yet “progress has been too slow – we have not gone far enough down the road. We are now in sight of a historic agreement – the world is waiting to see if words will translate into action, as we know they must.”
The UN Environmental Program (UNEP) has been expanded to become a “specialized agency” with a new title, UN Environmental Organization (UNEO). The UNEO will prop up the Sustainable Development division of the UN. The same agency that disseminates Agenda 21 policies to governments will be centralized into a global agency with powerful international backing.
Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary General devised the global sustainability panel that includes more than 50 supporters of the creation of UNEO.
“One option is the possible transformation of UNEP into a specialized agency of the United Nations. A strengthened UNEP could enhance coherence between relevant multilateral environmental agreements, and better integrate its work with the activities of development institutions, especially the United Nations Development Program,” states one recommendation.
To fund globalization, the UN will disburse a global carbon tax, redistribute the world’s wealth and install programs that will place all issues concerning humanity, poverty, the securitization of resources and education under its control and command.
They will force ecological taxes to steer large amounts of money into funds designed to redesign humanity, civilization and the planet – and fit them all into their mold. A carbon cap-and-trade tax system for industrial countries could yield $250 billion per year.
Through consolidation of power within the UN, the Agenda 21 scheme is being implemented locally; and finding success as fake grassroots efforts. The global Elite have perfected the art of convincing the general public that sustainability is a good idea. By employing them to pressure their local and state governments for adherence to UN Agenda 21 schemes, their work is easy. It is up to us to recognize that the sustainable legislation we are unknowingly pushing our elected officials to approve are contributing to the loss of our independence and sovereignty as a Constitutional Republic governed by our own laws.
Once we do this, we will no longer be manipulated into supporting the UN’s global governance agenda and once again be a free nation.
No comments:
Post a Comment